Kier <vallon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:12:23 +0000, Mark Kent wrote:
>
>> Jim Richardson <warlock@xxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:06:18 +0000,
>>> Kier <vallon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:08:33 +0000, Mark Kent wrote:
>>>>
>>
>>>>> Does Kier work for the BBC?
>>>>
>>>> Is Mark an idiot or just round the bend?
>>>>
>>>> Of course I don't work for the BBC, you loon! I have in fact stated
>>>> several times on various posts what I do for a living, and is has zero to
>>>> do with the BBC or MS.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Mark has issues.
>>>
>>
>> Can't see what was wrong with that question, myself. It is perfectly
>> reasonable. For kier, and yourself, to react in that way indicates
>> where the issues are - they are obviously not with me.
>
> You are mad.
>
>>
>> Clearly, the answer to this question is either "yes" or "no". Neither
>> you, nor Kier, seem able to achieve this. Instead, you are trolling,
>> Jim. Now, why would you be trolling me?
>
> What part of 'of course I don't work for the BBC' escaped you? That is, is
> it not, an unequivocal 'no'.
>
> Why do you assume everyone who differs from your opinion is trolling?
Because he's an egotistical wind bag who is only slightly less boring
than William Poaster. Kier, how can you even bother arguing with this
certified lunatic? He makes Peter Koehlmann seem "moderate" in his
views.
|
|
