On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:29:48 -0500, Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:03:53 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>
>> ____/ Kier on Wednesday 16 January 2008 16:51 : \____
>>
>>> On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:17:57 -0500, Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:51:49 +0000, Kier wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:02:17 -0500, Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:58:41 -0800, Tim Smith wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <0v1v55-41s.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>>>>>>> Mark Kent <mark.kent@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>> One could begin to believe that maybe it's just a person site, until you
>>>>>>>> realise that the guy who writes "OPLC News" actually works for Intel on
>>>>>>>> the competing Classmate PC, and he's *bought* advertising at Google for
>>>>>>>> his "personal blog" which just happens to have taken the name of a
>>>>>>>> project which competes with his day job.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What an appalling state of affairs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What is this, a FUD relay race? After Roy acknowledges that this story
>>>>>>> was wrong, you grab it and start spreading it? See
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=416106&cid=22017038>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I guess they are trying to do to slashdot what they have done to COLA.
>>>>>> IOW the same 3 posters talking to each other.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BTW Roy has multiple accounts on Slashdot. He also posts as Anonymous
>>>>>> Coward" over there.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you have any actual proofg of that or are you just continuing to sling
>>>>> mud in the hope it will stick?
>>>>
>>>> He posted a message here in COLA a day or 2 ago where he said he posted
>>>> here as Anonymous Coward just to see what happened.
>>>
>>> Once. And he made it obvious, deliberately.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Seems really a coincidence that there is a post from an Anonymous Coward
>>>> over on Slashdot and in the thread where Roy's Intel OLPC conspiracy
>>>> theories are being ripped to shreds by Mary Lou Jepsen.
>>>> The words, the style all match Roy to a Tee.
>>>>
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/fc9984b34e24d81d
>>>>
>>>> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=416106&cid=22017038
>>>>
>>>> Sound like anyone we all know and love?
>>>> See the strange, non human like formatting of the message?
>>>
>>> All that could be said of you, flatty, since you cannot hide yourself
>>> whenever you post. Same formatting, same obsessions, same everything. Do
>>> you think no one notices that?
>>>
>>> As for your link accusing Roy, it show no resemblence whatever to him.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Of course, you will need a signed CV for proof because you are just like
>>>> they are, in total denial.
>>>> Common sense and reason don't seem to be your strong point Kier.
>>>
>>> Lying idiot. Considering the dishonest filth you've posted about Roy, you
>>> can hardly claim any rectitude or superiority over anyone here.
>>
>> He is lying again. Thanks Kier for defending me (and making Gary's libel
>> visible for me to be aware of).
>
> Yawwnnn,.
> Sucking up to Kier again?
> Shame on you.
>
> You've been busted Roy. It's not libel it's opinion and is backed up by
> some pretty decent circumstantial evidence, unlike most of the garbage you
> post.
>
> I'd love to see it in a court of law.
> You admit you post here as anonymous coward.
Once, past tense.
> There is currently a thread here that is proving you to be liar with
> regards to the Intel/OLPC topic.
> Out of the blue, a person using the same exact nym, right down to the
> letter, *just happens to post* into that exact thread on Slashdot.
Common nym. Proves no link with Roy whatever.
>
> Additionally, the writing style, the paragraph formatting and the
> vocabulary, right down to your condescending narcissistic style, is a
> pretty good match for your typical SPAM posts.
No, it isn't.
>
> The jury won't even have to leave the jury box to deliberate.
> A raise of hands will be more than enough to convict you.
>
> As for you not reading my posts, who cares?
> I certainly don't.
Then why do you keep on posting your shit?
--
Kier
|
|
