Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: FUD baton passed to Mark Kent? (was Re: [News] Intel BUSTED Astroturfing Against OLPC/Linux, Spits and Fuels Anti-OLPC Slurs)

On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:29:48 -0500, Moshe Goldfarb wrote:

> On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:03:53 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> 
>> ____/ Kier on Wednesday 16 January 2008 16:51 : \____
>> 
>>> On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:17:57 -0500, Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:51:49 +0000, Kier wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:02:17 -0500, Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:58:41 -0800, Tim Smith wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> In article <0v1v55-41s.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>>>>>>>  Mark Kent <mark.kent@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>> One could begin to believe that maybe it's just a person site, until you
>>>>>>>> realise that the guy who writes "OPLC News" actually works for Intel on
>>>>>>>> the competing Classmate PC, and he's *bought* advertising at Google for
>>>>>>>> his "personal blog" which just happens to have taken the name of a
>>>>>>>> project which competes with his day job.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> What an appalling state of affairs.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> What is this, a FUD relay race?  After Roy acknowledges that this story
>>>>>>> was wrong, you grab it and start spreading it?  See
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>    <http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=416106&cid=22017038>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I guess they are trying to do to slashdot what they have done to COLA.
>>>>>> IOW the same 3 posters talking to each other.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> BTW Roy has multiple accounts on Slashdot. He also posts as Anonymous
>>>>>> Coward" over there.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Do you have any actual proofg of that or are you just continuing to sling
>>>>> mud in the hope it will stick?
>>>> 
>>>> He posted a message here in COLA a day or 2 ago where he said he posted
>>>> here as Anonymous Coward just to see what happened.
>>> 
>>> Once. And he made it obvious, deliberately.
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Seems really a coincidence that there is a post from an Anonymous Coward
>>>> over on Slashdot and in the thread where Roy's Intel OLPC conspiracy
>>>> theories are being ripped to shreds by Mary Lou Jepsen.
>>>> The words, the style all match Roy to a Tee.
>>>> 
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/fc9984b34e24d81d
>>>> 
>>>> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=416106&cid=22017038
>>>> 
>>>> Sound like anyone we all know and love?
>>>> See the strange, non human like formatting of the message?
>>> 
>>> All that could be said of you, flatty, since you cannot hide yourself
>>> whenever you post. Same formatting, same obsessions, same everything. Do
>>> you think no one notices that?
>>> 
>>> As for your link accusing Roy, it show no resemblence whatever to him.
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Of course, you will need a signed CV for proof because you are just like
>>>> they are, in total denial.
>>>> Common sense and reason don't seem to be your strong point Kier.
>>> 
>>> Lying idiot. Considering the dishonest filth you've posted about Roy, you
>>> can hardly claim any rectitude or superiority over anyone here.
>> 
>> He is lying again. Thanks Kier for defending me (and making Gary's libel
>> visible for me to be aware of).
> 
> Yawwnnn,.
> Sucking up to Kier again?
> Shame on you.
> 
> You've been busted Roy. It's not libel it's opinion and is backed up by
> some pretty decent circumstantial  evidence, unlike most of the garbage you
> post.
> 
> I'd love to see it in a court of law.
> You admit you post here as anonymous coward.

Once, past tense. 

> There is currently a thread here that is proving you to be liar with
> regards to the Intel/OLPC topic.
> Out of the blue, a person using the same exact nym, right down to the
> letter, *just happens to post* into that exact thread on Slashdot.

Common nym. Proves no link with Roy whatever. 

> 
> Additionally, the writing style, the paragraph formatting and the
> vocabulary, right down to your condescending narcissistic style, is a
> pretty good match for your typical SPAM posts.

No, it isn't.
> 
> The jury won't even have to leave the jury box to deliberate.
> A raise of hands will be more than enough to convict you.
> 
> As for you not reading my posts, who cares?
> I certainly don't.

Then why do you keep on posting your shit?

-- 
Kier


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index