Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Linus Torvalds, Geek of the Week

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

____/ Homer on Saturday 19 July 2008 17:01 : \____

> Verily I say unto thee, that nessuno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx spake thusly:
> 
>> <Quote>
>> RM:  'I can’t end without asking you about the Steve Ballmer quote.
>> You know the one where he said 'Linux is a cancer that attaches
>> itself in an intellectual property sense to everything it touches.'
>> What do you think he meant by this?'
>> 
>> LT: 'I have a hard time really seeing what the heck Ballmer is doing.
>>  First the monkey dance, then the chair throwing. At some point he
>> called Linux 'un-American', apparently because he doesn't like the
>> competition. Then the cancer thing. And now this fixation with Yahoo!
>>  When will it end?
>> 
>> So what can I say? I think he tried to say that open source grows
>> very aggressively and takes over (which is good - if you're into that
>> whole expanding markets thing), but he wanted to put it in terms of
>> something that grows out of control and is bad for what it is growing
>>  in. Thus: cancer.
>> 
>> So I can certainly see the logic of choosing that word. '
>> 
>> RM: 'Do you think it makes any sense?'
>> 
>> LT: 'Do I think it makes sense? No. Of course open source grows
>> aggressively: what's not to like? Low cost, great quality, and a lack
>>  of being shackled to some commercial company that you can't really
>> trust further than the fact that they'll happily continue to take
>> your money. Sure, it grows.
>> 
>> And yes, it does grow at the cost of Microsoft, but that's called
>> ’competition’. It doesn't make it 'cancer' any more than it ever made
>>  it 'un-American'.
>> </Quote>
>> 
>>
http://www.simple-talk.com/opinion/geek-of-the-week/linus-torvalds,-geek-of-the-week/
> 
> I thought it was pretty clear that Ballmer was actually referring to the
> GPL, which promotes Freedom (his nemesis which he derides as "cancer"),
> in contrast to the slavery of Intellectual Monopoly, which is pretty
> much all that keeps Microsoft in business. However, the spread of one is
> no more pervasive than the other, it's simply two opposing sides of the
> same battle. It could equally be argued that Microsoft's destruction and
> assimilation of other companies and standards, and their agenda of
> spreading the disease of Intellectual Monopoly, is also a "cancer".
 
Watch the bit in this interview about Intellectual Monopolies. He slams
patents. PJ chose not to quote this.

- -- 
                ~~ Best of wishes

Surely, Microsoft has given up on altruism in the IT industry
http://Schestowitz.com  |  Open Prospects   |     PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Tasks: 171 total,   1 running, 170 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
      http://iuron.com - knowledge engine, not a search engine
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkiCRvgACgkQU4xAY3RXLo5BxACfXlyaYd59+0R8IltKX2KRmoXG
LsIAnjb5cPL8rMBqC5W3plWA94iT5Yt5
=+205
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index