Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [News] Firefox 3.1 Alpha Out Shortly

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

____/ Subway steel on Wednesday 16 July 2008 21:17 : \____

> 
> "Roy Schestowitz" <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1634757.Hgl7OAz11o@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> ____/ Subway steel on Wednesday 16 July 2008 16:33 : \____
>>
>>> "Roy Schestowitz" <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:1653280.JO87W8ysmY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>
>>>> Firefox 3.1 alpha 1 code freeze is next Monday
>>>>
>>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>>> | Firefox 3 has only recently shipped but the first public milestone for
>>>> its
>>>> | successor is fast approaching. The Mozilla team is expecting that the
>>>> code
>>>> | freeeze for alpha 1 of Firefox 3.1, code named Shiretoko, will be next
>>>> Monday
>>>> | and that alpha 1 be available for early adopter testing on July 25.
>>>> `----
>>>>
>>>> http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=2656
>>>
>>> Does this mean that Firefox is a "work in progress" too?
>>
>> No, that would be Vista (RTM, SP1, not alpha).
>>
>> Ballmer: Vista Is 'a Work in Progress'
> 
> Roy,
> 
> I know about the Vista "work in progress" comment and that's why I made the
> joke. But all joking aside, what's the difference between Vista being a
> "work in progress" where subsequent updates like SP1 are released and
> something like Firefox or Ubuntu which are also being developed, getting
> bugs fixed, features and security improved. Ubuntu 8.04 shipped but it
> obviously wasn't "100% ready" because just a few weeks later a bunch of
> updates were released for it. Firefox 3.0 shipped and it also wasn't "100%
> ready" because just a few weeks later there's already another "alpha" out
> for it.

No, no, this is separate. 8.04.1 is not like 3.1. Firefox had its code frozen
at 3.0 a long time ago (like 6 months) and Mozilla ironed things out while
other devs merged new features into 3.1.

> Don't get me wrong Roy, I'm not trying to stir up an argument here. I'm
> simply looking for consistency on why you view it as being a negative if one
> product is still be developed but when other products follow the exact same
> development model then it's viewed as being a "good thing"(tm).

Ubuntu 8.04 was inappropriate for an LTS assuming people do not obtain 8.04.1,
which also has a final FF3.

>> ,----[ Quote ]
>> | As PC users clamor for Microsoft to continue to support Windows XP,
>> company
>> | CEO Steve Ballmer called the Vista OS "a work in progress" at an annual
>> | Seattle event on Thursday.
>> `----
>>
>>
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/144773/ballmer_vista_is_a_work_in_progress.html
>>
>> - --
>>                ~~ Best of wishes
>>
>> Roy S. Schestowitz      |    "All your archives are (sic) belong to
>> Google"
>> http://Schestowitz.com  |  GNU is Not UNIX  |     PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
>>      http://iuron.com - proposing a non-profit search engine
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>>
>> iEYEARECAAYFAkh+Q4UACgkQU4xAY3RXLo63wwCgg5W7n/MFbEfQhFscTFXQ5O5G
>> iIwAn2BKztHOUyZVlwElX8t7OegE1saU
>> =9xFU
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

- -- 
                ~~ Best of wishes

Roy S. Schestowitz      |    "Avoid missing ball for higher score"
http://Schestowitz.com  | Free as in Free Beer |  PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Cpu(s): 20.3%us,  3.7%sy,  0.0%ni, 70.6%id,  5.1%wa,  0.0%hi,  0.4%si,  0.0%st
      http://iuron.com - semantic engine to gather information
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkh+dA4ACgkQU4xAY3RXLo4TiQCgsRvoyg18ha3M6nJVoP1iwiDn
1qkAniOEURs6TjN7W632Rq5QhQM4MFe2
=yCcU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index