In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Moshe Goldfarb.
<brick_n_straw@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on Tue, 15 Jul 2008 21:11:06 -0400
<112gurw8i2nhe$.1kapjbjey01l6$.dlg@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:56:05 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>
>
>> That's what they labeled early builds of 4.0. Or 3.8...
>>
>> There's plenty of time for KDE4 to become as stable and feature-complete as
>> 3.5.x. There will be another new release of 3.5 next month. It's not going
>> away until KDE4 is rock solid.
>>
>
>
> But........
>
> You Linux loons have been claiming that there is nothing wrong with Kde
> 4.x?
There is plenty wrong with KDE 4.0. For starters, it looks nothing at
all like Gnome, and the set-points of the GUI configuration do not
overlap 100%.
>
> So now we have to wait until KDE 4.x is stable?
Not at all. One can merely go back to Windows Vista,
which is now stable.
>
> What a bunch of liars you Linux loons are....
>
--
#191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Linux. Because Windows' Blue Screen Of Death is just
way too frightening to novice users.
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
|
|
