-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
____/ RonB on Saturday 26 July 2008 02:21 : \____
> Rodge Hoenshell wrote:
>
>> If you want that why not just use MACS? I do not get it? Seems many
>> people in the comments do not either.
>>
>> Also does not seem to create stationary.
>
> You're the one who wanted your Linux to look like a Mac, Roy was giving you
> a link to do it.
>
> One reason I can mention for not using Macs. Macs are way too expensive for
> what they do. This Dell GX240 cost $65 on eBay (including $30 s/h). I added
> a $24 DVD writer (that also included shipping), $10 for a better video ($5
> plus s/h), and about $20 for 512Meg of additional memory ($16 plus s/h). So
> my computer cost $120. Add SuSE 10.3 (free), download VirtualBox and I can
> run Win 2K in a virtual machine. (Since the computer came with OEM Win2K,
> that was also free -- to me.) What can you buy for $120 when shopping for a
> Mac?
>
> Besides, what would I do with a Mac that I can't do with Linux?
>
> And, what in the world is "stationary" (stationery?) and why should I care?
I don't mimic OS X myself, but some people prefer it that way. KDE has
functionality that's a lot more powerful than this and Compiz-Fusion seems a
lot more impressive and fun.
As for stationery, are you trying to mimic Outlook? Have you looked at
Thunderbird and its extensions yet?
- --
~~ Best of wishes
Microsoft loves competition.
"Linux is a cancer that attaches itself in an intellectual property sense to
everything it touches."
--Steve Ballmer, Microsoft CEO
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkiKtK4ACgkQU4xAY3RXLo6UMQCgme6Hdyz+Bmr+72mhJmMxl22O
KhkAmgOqQlnd2k+5VnjfJ0FtrzL1fZe7
=Ow8n
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
