Moshe Goldfarb (flatfish) wrote:
> Tim Smith wrote:
>> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>>> DFS wrote:
>>>> Homer wrote:
>>>>>> DFS wrote:
>>>>>>> Homer wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> One thing this fiasco highlights yet again is that any updates to
>>>>>>>> proprietary platforms are bound to cause utter chaos, due to the
>>>>>>>> disparate nature of proprietary software that comes from many
>>>>>>>> vendors, without much (or any) cross-vendor collaboration.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This doesn't happen with GNU/Linux. Even though most of the
>>>>>>>> software on any given GNU/Linux distro originates from an
>>>>>>>> upstream third party, it is nonetheless built and tested on a
>>>>>>>> single buildsystem by the vendor, and subsequently tested against
>>>>>>>> the rest of the software in that tree. Therefore things like
>>>>>>>> broken dependencies or conflicts never happen,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LMAO! You made a funny, [H]ypocrite!
>>>>>
>>>>> Please provide proof of this supposed "hypocrisy" or shut the fuck
>>>>> up. Read the context. "Things like broken dependencies or
>>>>> conflicts never happen" ... as a result of disparate sources and
>>>>> lack of collaboration. [...]
>>>>
>>>> That would be where you slimed down to Nigeria to actively help
>>>> pollute the country by helping with proprietary oil drilling
>>>> software, then tried to indict the Gates Foundation for merely
>>>> investing in the publicly traded stock of companies that do the same.
>>>
>>> Lie.
>>
>> What is a lie? [H]omer has discussed on this very newsgroup his trip
>> to Nigeria to install software for a drilling company. See the thread
>> titled "OT: Oh no! Not another overseas contract!" from July 2004 for
>> details.
>
> It's the Mafia gang mentality at work. HPT is hoping he gets all 5 Linux
> advocates to "me too" his post and thus turn his lies into proof....
>
> It hasn't happened because even the Linux loons are smart enough to know.
Another illiteracy "me too" post. Context was updates to GNU/Linux versus
proprietary software. DFS moves the goal post by bringing up 4-year old
accusational issues having nothing to do with the discussion (read
"slimed", "pollute", "indict") and you support him.
--
HPT
|
|
