-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Law.com article spins old confusions into new "danger"
,----[ Quote ]
| Law.com recently ran a sensationalist piece by Edmund J. Walsh warning of the
| impending “dangerous real world business dispute” in store for any for-profit
| company that uses free software. Walsh points to lawsuits filed by SFLC on
| behalf BusyBox as a source of this danger, and having worked on those
| lawsuits, I hope I can provide a helpful counterpoint.
|
| [...]
|
| So why do they keep the code to themselves? We can speculate on the reasons—
| ignorance of their legal obligations, indifference owing to a history of
| non-enforcement, etc.—but it seems that in the overwhelming majority of
| cases, the decision has nothing to do with protecting a proprietary business
| model. Whether they license proprietary software or FOSS, for-profit
| companies should of course pay attention to their legal obligations. But so
| long as they do so, they need not fear any “irreconcilable conflict” between
| making money and using FOSS.
`----
http://www.softwarefreedom.org/blog/2008/jun/05/enforcement-lawsuits/
Related:
Is McAfee just asking for a lawsuit?
,----[ Quoet ]
| Eben Moglen and the troops at the Software Freedom Law Center may want to
| read the McAfee annual report more than once. Without this warning there’s a
| chance Eben may do a spit-take on his morning coffee.
|
| McAfee stock is down 20% in the last two months and, it seems, they’re just
| asking to be sued.
`----
http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=1864
McAfee throws some FUD at the GPL
,----[ Quote ]
| In its annual report, Windows security software vendor McAfee told its
| investors that open source software licence terms it vaguely characterised
| as " ambiguous" might "result in unanticipated obligations regarding our
| products."
|
| [...]
|
| That statement says several things. First, it reveals that McAfee does use at
| least some open source software derived code in its products. Second, it
| betrays that McAfee has misappropriated that open source software and thus is
| committing copyright infringement, because it doesn't distribute that open
| source software derivative source code. Third, by calling its products that
| include open source software code "proprietary", McAfee shows that it really
| doesn't want to shoulder its GPL licence obligations, but instead wants to
| both have its cake and eat it too.
`----
http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/news/2008/01/05/mcafee-throws-fud-gpl
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFISOGcU4xAY3RXLo4RAr/6AJ9aj1Fr+1D3mUIrVXx6pJ79gEfL/ACeJgcC
5OQYx0swfL3lNeJy7YOo0ng=
=R4xE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
