-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
____/ Sinister Midget on Saturday 28 June 2008 18:08 : \____
> On 2008-06-28, Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> claimed:
>> On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 12:06:42 -0400, Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
>
>>> As usual, Roy distorts the truth.
>>>
>>> KWord has not "got" ODF Support, it's in the process of getting ODF
>>> support, very minimal ODF support at that (the author admits to ignore much
>>> of it).
>>>
>>> All that is odd, since Koffice has long been heralded as having support for
>>> ODF, so why is KWord just now getting ODF?
>>>
>>> In fact, this claims KWord has had ODF support since 1.4 and full native
>>> support since 1.5? Is that not true?
>>>
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenDocument_software
>>
>> I should clarify, that I was referring to the article, which claims ODF
>> support is being added. I don't know the actual state, which is why I
>> asked the question at the end.
>
> You had to "clarify" because you shot from the hip and realized you
> made an ass of yourself (as usual) again. No need to "clarify" that.
> Everybody already saw it when you accused Roy of "distorting the truth"
> since you couldn't fathom the difference between the tense of two
> verbs, one he used and one you wanted to trash him over despite his not
> using it.
ErikMunchk, watch the links in the OP. There's more than 2, which puts things
in perspective.
Hope it helps.
- --
~~ Best of wishes
Roy S. Schestowitz | Open Source Reversi: http://othellomaster.com
http://Schestowitz.com | GNU is Not UNIX | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
http://iuron.com - proposing a non-profit search engine
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFIZoWyU4xAY3RXLo4RAmW1AKCsZK8zTMv3QyRD2ujQD6O+vhYHxACgqEB4
QDuVtwFBNgrt9nuz+dQbqWI=
=PFT8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
