Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Microsoft promises to deliver interoperability documents by March 2009
>
> ,----[ Quote ]
> | Whatever. It has taken Microsoft many years and it still can't - or,
> | rather, won't - provide documentation that it must already have
> | internally?
> `----
>
> http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-9976946-16.html
>
> The company just needs to be embargoed. It's not interested in complying.
>
>
> Days ago:
>
> Microsoft Deleted Windows Interoperability Documents, Feds Say
>
> ,----[ Quote ]
> | Microsoft has stopped publishing some of the technical documentation
> | that rival software makers may need to make their products interoperable
> | with the Windows operating system, according to a court-mandated
> | committee overseeing Microsoft's compliance with a federal antitrust
> | settlement.
> `----
>
> http://www.informationweek.com/news/windows/operatingsystems
showArticle.jhtml?articleID=208800293
The judge can and should order the complete GPL'ing of the source code.
The plaintiffs should encourage the courts on what they think is
the most damaging remedy for such cretinous behaviour by Micoshaft towards
the courts.
|
|
