On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 17:51:23 -0600, High Plains Thumper wrote:
> Ruby Murray wrote:
>
>> I am a linux advocate.
>
> <snip astroturf dialogue ala flatfish puppet>
>
>> Its sad for me too, as I was one of the believers once. But desktop
>> Linux is virtualy being kicked out of the last chance saloon. To save
>> it is possible, but some philosophies need to change, and quickly.
This passage is similar to Quack's "linux is doomed" rant:-
<quote>
Linux as a desktop OS is pretty much doomed it would appear.
Too little too late.
<unquote>
Hadron <hadronquark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <fnd3jj$or8$2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
comp.os.linux.advocacy
Fri, 25 Jan 2008
Looks like the BT troll used teh same theme, huh.
>> what needs to be done:-
>
> Desktop is not on Life Support. W3Schools has Linux web hits at 3.6%,
> discounting Linux machines mimicking Windows and IE to access Microsoft
> required web access pages, and that 42% of hits is US, which is heavily
> dominated by Microsoft Windows desktop. Actual deployments are around 12%
> to 13%, give or take. Current market share methodologies do not provide
> accurate numbers.
They never did.
>> Truth hurts, smell the coffee.
>
> Yes it does, doesn't it?
It must do, otherwise why are the wintrolls trolling so loudly & often.
--
Mandriva 2008.1 64-bit.
This message was sent from a
computer which is guaranteed
100% free of the M$ Windoze virus.
|
|
