Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> ____/ Mark Kent on Monday 10 March 2008 10:55 : \____
>
>> Jesper Lund Stocholm <jls2008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>> Jim Richardson <warlock@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
>>> news:3l5fa5-q6f.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxx:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 19:21:44 -0800,
>>>> Tim Smith <reply_in_group@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> In article <i6b3a5-o6n.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
>>>>> Jim Richardson <warlock@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>> But would you refuse to allow the meeting to be recorded and
>>>>>> broadcast?
>>>>>
>>>>> It's hard to say, because it would have been so weird to have someone
>>>>> want to. It probably would have come down to whether or not any of
>>>>> the attendees objected.
>>>>>
>>>> Unless I missunderstood Mr Stockholm, it was not permitted.
>>>
>>> Well, it was not discussed, as far as I remember. The first thing (after
>>> the first break) the Convener did the first morning was to say that we were
>>> not allowed to take pictures in the room since some delegates were not
>>> happy to see pictures of them on the internet.
>>>
>>> There was no objections to this.
>>>
>>> PS: My Surname is without a 'k' :o)
>>>
>>
>> Which is a strange ruling. Why not say /which/ delegates object , say,
>> and determine that their pictures may not be taken, but anyone else's
>> can?
>>
>> I've *never* heard of any such ruling in any meeting I either attended
>> or chaired in ETSI, ITU-T, ITU-R, Intelsat, Linux Foundation, or
>> anywhere else. Furthermore, I doubt that it could even be held to be
>> valid.
>>
>> It sounds more like people are trying to cover their tracks, to me.
>
> Yes, indeed. And with all due respect, Mr. Stocholm, as a Microsoft partner in
> a Linux NG, is hardly worth responding to. The Microsoft partners who
> subverted the process just don't like to be named (and shamed). People who
> Google them find out how they screw their country and it's easier when they
> have names.
You should talk to Marti about screwing people. He has your picture on
his creepy hackwerk.
*Brrr*
>
> The partners serve Microsoft, their paymaster. They don't serve their
> country.
You're losing the plot Roy. Get help before it's too late.
|
|
