Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] [Rival] Microsoft Still Faces EU Antitrust over Web Standards

  • Subject: [News] [Rival] Microsoft Still Faces EU Antitrust over Web Standards
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 15:14:28 +0000
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: Freelance
  • User-agent: KNode/0.10.4
Opera: IE8's changes don't let Microsoft off legal hook

,----[ Quote ]
| Microsoft Corp.'s rivals have applauded some of what they've seen in the new 
| Internet Explorer 8 (IE8), but the browser maker that has complained to 
| antitrust regulators in Europe said the changes don't address all its 
| concerns.   
`----

http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9067281&source=rss_news50

It's like someone who slays people for 10 years, but then stops and asks for
the court's mercy. Damage has already been done. And Silverlight is also under
a separate EU investigation and the wrath of the States.


Related:

Gates deposition videos

,----[ Quote ]
| Boies: Do you remember that in January, 1996, a lot of OEMs were
| bundling non-Microsoft browsers?
| 
| Gates: I'm not sure.
| 
| Boies: What were the non-Microsoft browsers that you were
| concerned about in January of 1996?
| 
| Gates: What's the question? You're trying to get me to recall
| what other browsers I was thinking about when I wrote that sentence?
| 
| Boies: No, because you've told me that you don't know what you
| were thinking about when you wrote that sentence.
| 
| Gates: Right.
| 
| Boies: What I'm trying to do is get you to tell me what
| non-Microsoft browsers you were concerned about in January of
| 1996. If it had been only one, I probably would have used the
| name of it. Instead I seem to be using the term non-Microsoft
| browsers. My question is what non-Microsoft browsers were you 
| concerned about in January of 1996?
| 
| Gates: I'm sure -- what's the question? Is it -- are you asking
| me about when I wrote this e-mail or what are you asking me about?
| 
| Boies: I'm asking you about January of 1996.
| 
| Gates: That month?
| 
| Boies: Yes, sir.
| 
| Gates: And what about it?
| 
| Boies: What non-Microsoft browsers were you concerned about in
| January of 1996?
| 
| Gates: I don't know what you mean "concerned."
| 
| Boies: What is it about the word "concerned" that you don't
| understand?
| 
| Gates: I'm not sure what you mean by it. 
`----

http://wincent.com/a/about/wincent/weblog/archives/2007/02/gates_depositio.php


Gates Deposition Audio and Video

,----[ Quote ]
| Here is our local copy of the depositions of Bill Gates in the
| Microsoft anti-trust suit. We did our best to convert the
| original Windows Media files into an Open format, ogg. Your
| webmaster is responsible for the video transcoding, the
| audio-only files are contributed by a Groklaw member that
| requested to stay anonymous.
`----

http://www.groklaw.net/staticpages/index.php?page=GatesDepo


,----[ Quote ]
| From:       Bill Gates
| Sent:       Saturday, December 05, 1989 9:44 AM
| To:         Bob Muglia (Exchange); Jon DeVaan; Steven Sinofsky
| Cc:         Paul Mariz
| Subject:    Office rendering
| 
| One thing we have got to change is our strategy -- allowing Office 
| documents to be rendered very well by OTHER PEOPLES BROWSERS is one of the 
| most destructive things we could do to the company.
| 
| We have to stop putting any effort into this and make sure that Office
| documents very well depends on PROPRIETARY IE capabilities.
| 
| Anything else is suicide for our platform. This is a case where Office has
| to  to destroy Windows.
`----

http://antitrust.slated.org/www.iowaconsumercase.org/011607/2000/PX02991.pdf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index