On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 07:52:11 +0100, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
> Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 19:58:12 -0500, Linonut wrote:
>>
>>> * Tim Smith peremptorily fired off this memo:
>>>
>>>> In article <2390633.9di2NJZG19@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>>>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> Such a thread would belong in the Windows advocacy group. Posts about
>>>>> Windows fit here where Microsoft takes direct action against Linux,
>>>>> i.e. if it actively sabotages adoption of its #1 threat according to
>>>>> Ballmer, just 10 days ago).
>>>>>
>>>>> Just my personal interpretation of the charter anyway...
>>>>
>>>> OK, that explains a small fraction of your Windows posts here. What
>>>> about the rest?
>>>
>>> Let Roy post what he wants.
>>>
>>> You guys do.
>>>
>>> Either way, it is the reader's responsibility to filter and analyze the
>>> resultant verbiage.
>>>
>>> I would suggest it would be more productive, Tim, to allocate your
>>> resources to countering or exposing the more extreme forms of idiocy
>>> that occur in COLA.
>>
>> Many people read, or try to read this group via Google groups and Roy's
>> crap floods make it almost impossible to find threads where people are
>> actually discussing something.
>>
>> Also, Roy's crap floods makes the group look like a SPAM trap to noobs
>> looking via Google Groups.
>>
>> They see 3 pages of messages with no replies and the same author and to a
>> noob wandering into the group for the first time, it might as well be
>> Viagra SPAM.
>>
>
> Yu mean the "crap flood" of your posts, right?
> After all, you are posting as much and sometimes *more* than Roy does. And
> *none* of your posts has any salvageable content
This is supposed to be a discussion group.
My posts generate discussion and replies.
Roy's don't.
--
Moshe Goldfarb
Collector of soaps from around the globe.
Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
|
|
