Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 19:58:12 -0500, Linonut wrote:
>
>> * Tim Smith peremptorily fired off this memo:
>>
>>> In article <2390633.9di2NJZG19@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> Such a thread would belong in the Windows advocacy group. Posts about
>>>> Windows fit here where Microsoft takes direct action against Linux,
>>>> i.e. if it actively sabotages adoption of its #1 threat according to
>>>> Ballmer, just 10 days ago).
>>>>
>>>> Just my personal interpretation of the charter anyway...
>>>
>>> OK, that explains a small fraction of your Windows posts here. What
>>> about the rest?
>>
>> Let Roy post what he wants.
>>
>> You guys do.
>>
>> Either way, it is the reader's responsibility to filter and analyze the
>> resultant verbiage.
>>
>> I would suggest it would be more productive, Tim, to allocate your
>> resources to countering or exposing the more extreme forms of idiocy
>> that occur in COLA.
>
> Many people read, or try to read this group via Google groups and Roy's
> crap floods make it almost impossible to find threads where people are
> actually discussing something.
>
> Also, Roy's crap floods makes the group look like a SPAM trap to noobs
> looking via Google Groups.
>
> They see 3 pages of messages with no replies and the same author and to a
> noob wandering into the group for the first time, it might as well be
> Viagra SPAM.
>
Yu mean the "crap flood" of your posts, right?
After all, you are posting as much and sometimes *more* than Roy does. And
*none* of your posts has any salvageable content
--
Microsoft's Guide To System Design:
Let it get in YOUR way. The problem for your problem.
|
|
