Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [Roy Schestowitz Lies Again] Microsoft Emits Pile of Worthless Code (Failed UNIX Copycat) (was: [News] Microsoft Emits Pile of Worthless Code (Failed UNIX Copycat))

  • Subject: Re: [Roy Schestowitz Lies Again] Microsoft Emits Pile of Worthless Code (Failed UNIX Copycat) (was: [News] Microsoft Emits Pile of Worthless Code (Failed UNIX Copycat))
  • From: Hadron <hadronquark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 21:32:07 +0100
  • Bytes: 2009
  • Cancel-lock: sha1:jHitoYrV6LtFNCtq/nOKrE+17lM=
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: http://www.linuxtoday.com/
  • References: <2679245.RShJUR7b3K@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <xwy54vl5lz9e$.dlg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • User-agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/23.0 (gnu/linux) on Lenny/Development
  • Xref: ellandroad.demon.co.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:616692
Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 14:25:23 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>
> No, Roy.  You are lying once again.
>
> Singlularity was never intended to "succeed" at anything, it was a research
> project, and Microsoft released it so that other researchers could benefit
> from the work they did.
>
> Secondly, Singularity is *NOT* a Unix copycat, and bears no resemblance to
> Unix *AT ALL*.
>
>  Two lies in one headline, wow.  You're getting good at it.

In another thread Richard Rasker is claiming that MS do NO research!

The mind boggles.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index