Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] [Rival] OOXML is Still Very Rare, Hard to Find

  • Subject: [News] [Rival] OOXML is Still Very Rare, Hard to Find
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 08:47:03 +0000
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: Netscape / schestowitz.com
  • User-agent: KNode/0.10.4
So where are all the OOXML documents?

,----[ Quote ]
| So with all this evident love for Microsoft Office 2007, why is it that 
| 6-months later there are only 63 OOXML spreadsheet documents on the web, 
| something like 0.3% of the number of ODF spreadsheet documents? How can there 
| be 300 companies supporting OOXML and only have 69 OOXML presentations on the 
| web? (This is starting to sound like when I say I support 30 minutes of 
| aerobic exercise a day. I don’t do it, but I sure support it!)     
| 
| OK, I know the argument about “dark matter”, that Google indexes only the tip 
| of the iceberg, that there is a lot of data squirreled away on PC 
| hard-drives, behind corporate fire walls, etc., stuff that Google will never 
| see.  But the same is equally true for ODF documents, right?  I have tons of 
| ODF documents on my laptop, but none of them are indexed by Google.    
`----

http://pascaletmokatherine.wordpress.com/2008/03/03/so-where-are-all-the-ooxml-documents/


Related:

The world does not need a "conversion nightmare": a standard office file format
already exists

,----[ Quote ]
| Microsoft proposed a bogus Office file format while an ISO standard already 
| existed. Their shady practices to get their format fast-tracked and approved 
| by ISO didn’t work. But Microsoft is still trying—and I can guarantee, it 
| will keep on trying until it succeeds.   
| 
| The only possible answer for Microsoft and OOXML is simple: the world already 
| has an office file format. The world doesn’t need nor want a “conversion 
| nightmare”. The world’s ISO-approved Office format already exists: it’s 
| called ODF. Microsoft: deal with it!   
`----

http://www.freesoftwaremagazine.com/articles/editorial_22


Bam! Comical Creese debunks OpenDocumentFormat Alliance

,----[ Quote ]
| You are free to inspect the irregularities website that documents few cases 
| reported by the online press and blogs. We got much more reports on an 
| informal base per email. The Swedish single employee story is not credible, 
| actually committee stuffing took place in Sweden.   
| 
|     On loopholes, that’s another subjective call, but since Microsoft 
|     competitors managed to establish control over a standards initiative with 
|     potentially dire consequences for one of Microsoft’s most important 
|     business domains, we are not surprised that Microsoft (legitimately, 
|     albeit with what some consider to be poor standards etiquette) exploited 
|     the loopholes. As we noted, we assume ISO will update its procedures to 
|     eliminate the loopholes in the future.      
| 
| What?
| 
|     Microsoft competitors managed to establish control over a standards 
|     initiative… 
| 
| What?
| 
|     Microsoft competitors managed to establish control over a standards 
|     initiative with potentially dire consequences for one of Microsoft’s most 
|     important business domains, we are not surprised that Microsoft …
|     exploited the loopholes.   
| 
| ???
| 
|     but since Microsoft competitors managed to establish control over a 
|     standards initiative with potentially dire consequences for one of 
|     Microsoft’s most important business domains, we are not surprised that 
|     Microsoft (legitimately, albeit with what some consider to be poor 
|     standards etiquette) exploited the loopholes.    
`----

http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-41447/bam-comical-creese-debunks-opendocumentformat-alliance


Microsoft’s secretive standards orgs in Former Yugoslavia

,----[ Quote ]
| Croatian laws keep its national body’s votes secret, so the only way for the 
| Croatian public to find out how the process went would be if a board member 
| illegally leaked information out of CSI. This is, of course, unlikely to 
| happen. And the Serbian national standardization body is not officially 
| formed, so those two votes were easy for Microsoft, and probably not only 
| ones around the globe.      
`----

http://www.linuxworld.com/news/2007/092407-ooxml.html?page=1


Microsoft Tech Ed 2007: OpenXML

,----[ Quote ]
| He was asked "Why did Microsoft push OOXML through the "Fast Track" process 
| instead of the standard ISO process? Wouldn't they get less resistance than 
| faced now?"  
| 
| His response was very frank: "Office is a USD$10 billion revenue generator 
| for the company. When ODF was made an ISO standard, Microsoft had to react 
| quickly as certain governments have procurement policies which prefer ISO 
| standards. Ecma and OASIS are 'international standards', but ISO is the 
| international 'Gold Standard'. Microsoft therefore had to rush this standard 
| through. Its a simple matter of commercial interests!"     
`----            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

http://www.openmalaysiablog.com/2007/09/microsoft-tech-.html


Evidence of Microsoft Influencing OOXML Votes in Nordic States

,----[ Quote ]
| "This is how a standard is bought," Bosson wrote later. "I left the meeting 
| in protest - pissed off." 
`----

http://www.betanews.com/article/Evidence_of_Microsoft_Influencing_OOXML_Votes_in_Nordic_States/1188335569

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index