William Poaster <wp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
> Linonut wrote:
>
>> * Tim Smith peremptorily fired off this memo:
>>
>>> In article <1890979.TxppcjeX2B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> STILL with the big lie!! Erik, you little rotten...
>>>>
>>>> I AM NOT BEING PAID FOR ANY OF THIS. GET IT?
>>>
>>> You've repeatedly accused me, and Erik, and others, of being paid to
>>> post here. How come that's OK, but if we accuse you, it's the big lie?
>>> You're being hypocritical here. At least those accusing you have more
>>> evidence than you have for your accusations.
>>>
>>> . . .
>>>
>>> The only real question left is whether it is someone pro-Linux/anti-MS
>>> that is behind you, or whether it is someone anti-Linux/pro-MS who is
>>> trying to make Linux people look bad.
>>
>> The question is, why are you and Eric (and your apparent buddy "Moshe")
>> so concerned about Roy's posts, to the point that you beat on him
>> relentlessly about his collection of links to sites and articles that
>> might be of interest to Linux users and to those concerned about the
>> inordinate (and often deleterious) influence of Microsoft?
>
> Surely the question is, WHY are Smith & FUDDenbush in a *Linux* group? They
> don't use linux, nor advocate it (in spite of their protestations to the
> contrary).
>
They should not be here. The charter and faq of this group are quite
clear about its purpose; they deliberately post anti-charter material
on a regular basis.
My question is: why do so many regulars respond to them?
--
| Mark Kent -- mark at ellandroad dot demon dot co dot uk |
| Cola faq: http://www.faqs.org/faqs/linux/advocacy/faq-and-primer/ |
| Cola trolls: http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/ |
| My (new) blog: http://www.thereisnomagic.org |
|
|
