7 wrote:
> I think the key here is not to mix up GPL and anti-drm. A separate
> anti-drm license extension should be produced for certain projects
> that are key to targeting drm related violators of free software. It
> would only apply to certain key projects like codecs for example so
> that free software developers can use them on projects with higher
> than usual risks of violators being attracted to it like a magnet.
Sounds reasonable.
The problem is that the kind of people who abuse Free Software are not,
neither are those who evangelise Intellectual Monopoly.
The fact is that /all/ software, Free or otherwise, is "high risk",
given the predatory nature of certain companies.
--
K.
http://slated.org
.----
| 'When it comes to knowledge, "ownership" just doesn't make sense'
| ~ Cory Doctorow, The Guardian. http://tinyurl.com/22bgx8
`----
Fedora release 8 (Werewolf) on sky, running kernel 2.6.23.8-63.fc8
04:23:48 up 71 days, 1:59, 5 users, load average: 0.00, 0.04, 0.03
|
|
