* Tim Smith peremptorily fired off this memo:
> In article <SVsDj.21101$dT.17333@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Linonut <linonut@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > I'm still waiting for him to explain why, if I'm a Microsoft agent, I
>> > was allowed to testify *against* Microsoft in a large patent lawsuit.
>>
>> Ignoring any real history for the moment, how does being on one side at
>> one period in time prevent one from being on the other side at another
>> period in time?
>
> Roy alleges I've been a Microsoft agent for a long time before the
> lawsuit, and that I am an agent now, after the lawsuit. Are we supposed
> to believe that I resigned as an agent, participated in the lawsuit
> against them, and then afterwards asked for my agency back? And that
> Microsoft said, "sure, no hard feelings...you can have your job back"?
I could see it happening. It's a matter of simple expediency.
Or you could just simply want to be an asshole on your own time.
--
Bill Gates is a very rich man today ... and do you want to know why? The answer
is one word: versions.
-- Dave Barry
|
|
