On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:37:49 +0000, Roy Schestowitz
<newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>____/ John Bokma on Sunday 09 March 2008 19:29 : \____
>
>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> ____/ John Bokma on Thursday 06 March 2008 19:41 : \____
>>>
>>>> "Andrew Heenan" <andrew3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "John Bokma" <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote...
>>>>>> When is the next PR update scheduled?
>>>>>
>>>>> Last week.
>>>>>
>>>>> Spring is definitely in the air.
>>>>>
>>>>> Several of my new sites which had been grey are now white, one or
>>>>> two with green buds.
>>>>
>>>> Meh, still my 7 not back (it's 6 :-( ).
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> I saw similar surprises. LXer: 8 -> 5
>>>
>>> LinuxToday: 7 -> 5
>>>
>>> I reckoned they might penalise aggregation sites or maybe just strike
>>> against blogrolls.
>>
>> I dropped 5 months or so from 7 to 6. I've more the feeling that they made
>> the PR calculation a bit "tighter", because, maybe, too many high PR
>> sites? (Which I can imagine).
>
>My personal blog dropped from 6 to 5 about 4 months ago, but another stayed at
>6. I think it's a matter in inbound links ageing. Just going by gut feeling
>anyway...
It's penalising paid links that does it, it gets a ripple effect going
through the entire web.
BB
--
http://www.kruse.co.uk/
http://www.fat-odin.com/
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/
|
|
