Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:05:21 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>
>> ____/ Mark Kent on Tuesday 11 March 2008 08:56 : \____
>>
>>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>>> ____/ Mark Kent on Monday 10 March 2008 15:19 : \____
>>>>
>>>>> whether there've been any more "Swedens" with real cash changing
>>>>> hands, or whether we've had delegates turn up to these meetings who've
>>>>> never been before.
>>>>
>>>> They are just sitwarmers. Nothing to see here... they defend themselves
>> ^seat
>>>> (their bosses) while purporting to be representative of a nation.
>>>> Conflict of interests is what they call it...
>>>>
>>>> It doesn't matter how many smileys Jesper may post here. He is being
>>>> apologetic, having done the damage.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I share your suspicion. There is no excuse for trying to force this
>>> work through, and there has been no effort to do it properly.
>>
>> I am amazed to find Microsoft partners in a Linux newsgroup. They don't
>> just defend themselves. They defend OOXML now. Next step slamming the
>> GPL? Attacking advocates? How low has Microsoft sunk? I mean, I know the
>> company approaches debt and tries to hide this, but it's no reason or
>> excuse to harass its #1 competition.
>
> This *isn't* a Linux group.
> It's a Microsoft hate group.
>
>
Ca...Ching!
--
Micros~1 Accounting Department - 1 Payment Made:
Our records indicate that you've carried out your assigned mission. Your
account has been credited. Please use MS Money to view your current
balance.
News Alert: Area man finally discovers blogging...
http://tinyurl.com/2qeo3z
|
|
