On 10 Mar, 14:52, Moshe Goldfarb <brick.n.st...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 01:40:07 -0700, Tim Smith wrote:
> > Note this story on Slashdot:
>
> > <http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/07/09/1424259>
>
> > It's a submission about this article:
>
> > <http://itmanagement.earthweb.com/osrc/article.php/3687616>
>
> > which is one Roy wrote for Datamation.
>
> > Note that the Slashdot story is attributed to "Anonymous reader". So,
> > Roy, why did you submit the story about you Datamation article
> > anonymously? On other sites, you are quite shameless about submitting
> > links to your own writings. Why try to hide at Slashdot?
>
> > Were you not aware that it would still show up on your profile page
> > as being a submission of yours?
>
> > <http://slashdot.org/~schestowitz/>
>
> > (Of course, Roy is now going to accuse me of stalking him on Slashdot,
> > so I guess I should explain why I dared to look at his profile. He has
> > just announced that he's leaving Slashdot, and mentioned that his
> > stories have reached the front page several times. So I was curious to
> > see which stories these were, and checked his profile page).
>
> He made a similar speech on digg.com a few weeks ago, about not having the
> time to comment anymore.
>
> Interesting thing is he certainly seems to have enough time to crap flood
> digg multiple times a day with his stories.
>
> The point is, Roy is not interested in discussing Linux.
> He never has been.
> He is not interested in using the various sites like digg and slashdot in
> the manner that they were designed to be used.
> He is not interested in giving back via discussion.
>
> Roy doesn't have time for that.
>
> Roy Schestowitz is only interested in selfishly spewing his name and his
> sites all over the Internet for his own personal gain.
>
> I keep telling this group that this guy Roy Schestowitz is as bogus as a 9
> nine dollar bill but all they do is bury their collective heads in the
> sand.
>
> How much proof do these people need?
>
I've been alerted to a number of useful links / interesting articles /
alternative distibutions / specialised hardware etc. etc. from Roys on-
topic posts.
I have never found anything of any worth whatsoever in the posts you
make here. They are entirely value-free.
What's most puzzling is your motive in spending so much time, posting
on a newsgroup about an OS that you consider an irrelevance, in
supposed protection of a group of people you choose to pigeonhole
according to your own prejudices, and who you clearly despise.
I don't really subscribe to the "paid shill" theory without firm
evidence, but I can't think of any other reason, except for a lack of
fulfillment somewhere else in your life. The sum-total of your
contributions here appear to be a pointless waste of time and effort.
That would lead me to suspect that you vastly overstate the case when
referring to any satisfaction / acheivement in your real life.
|
|
