How this kind of thing works - Soft Bribery
,----[ Quote ]
| I'm gonna repost this comment from another ooxml "sudden flipflop" story - I
| posted it too late to get any attention then but I still wanted it visible.
| AC for obvious reasons! Also please bear in mind that all numbers are just
| for example's sake, but the general point is all too accurate. Also bear in
| mind I have no "inside" information on Durusau at all, I am just trying to
| tell you some backstory on how these deals can go down, including one I have
| specific knowledge of.
|
| -------
|
| I want to tell you Slashdot people something about how this kind of thing
| works. I don't really know the name for it, but I call it "soft bribery". You
| might also call it "economic alignment" or whatever. Here's what happens.
|
| A large, rich stakeholder wants a particular outcome - in this case, MS wants
| OOXML to be ratified. They have some adversaries - respected leaders of the
| OSS movement or ODF foundation, in this case. Note that there are always
| certain people with disproportionate voices - these people are really hurting
| them. How can they turn them around?
|
| They can't outright bribe them. That's illegal and probably wouldn't work
| anyway - people would feel insulted. So what they need to do is ensure that
| the "thought leader"'s economic interest is aligned with their own.
|
| We see this happen all the time - a previous strong advocate against
| something, in this case pro ODF and against OOXML, will suddenly get more
| concilatory. See Durusau's change of tone for an example. Now I don't know
| him, but I'm pretty sure here's what happened.
|
| He would be in constant contact with the OOXML team in MS just as a matter of
| course. One day, though, they'll tell him to expect a call from a VP or
| higher - big guns. He's excited to be able to reach higher up in the company.
| Finally, they're taking him seriously. He might be talking to a billionaire!
|
| He'll get the call. "Wow, we're really impressed with your work on this. My
| team is always telling me what a smart, together guy you are", says the VP or
| Partner or whatever. "I just wanted to tell you that we really appreciate the
| work you're doing and we can learn a lot from you. Say, when this is all
| over, if OOXML finally gets accepted - we'd love to get you in for some
| interoperability training and consulting, our staff could really use your
| insight. We pay pretty well, $500 an hour, and we estimate the contract would
| last for a year fulltime, but we're flexible with your current work - we just
| need you on call. What do you think?"
|
| There you go. That's it. A year's worth at $500/hr is close enough to a
| million bucks, the guy's got a mortgage, game over. Of course MS wants it
| kept quiet or the deal's off - that's their "standard business practise", and
| the contract has an NDA clause.
|
| Game over. I'm sure this is what happened to Durusau. I'm pretty sure it's
| what happened to Miguel. Unless you're independently wealthy, not many people
| can say no to a few hundred thousand in "consulting". Needless to say, he'll
| never step foot in any Microsoft building. Hell, maybe it's a lot less than a
| million - it was for someone I know.
|
| I am going to be very vague here - sorry if you think I lose credibility, but
| I don't want to burn my friend. He was the CEO/CTO (same guy) at a small
| systems integrator in the educational sector "somewhere in Asia". A largish
| school deal was in the works, his company advised decision makers in favour
| of linux. A respected company, had a lot of sway with the local suits, it was
| looking like going their way. One day he gets a call to the cell phone - wow,
| one of the big guns!
|
| "We really like the work you're doing. Say, it looks like this deal isn't
| going to go our way - but if it does, we'll need a partner to help us
| interoperate with the existing infrastructure - you installed a lot of it, so
| you're first in line and we'd like to book you in advance just to make sure
| we can get you. What are your rates? Well, we'd like to make sure we have you
| for at least six months and we actually pay a set rate in this area of $$$.
| Is that OK? We'll fax over our proposed contract right now, we're pretty
| eager to go ahead with this, so just to lock in our booking we'll deposit the
| first 25% of the contract as soon as you fax it back to us, is that good with
| you? Refundable if we don't get the deal of course. Commercial in confidence,
| naturally. Let us know ASAP, and good luck with the deal!"
|
| The contract was over triple what the linux deal would have earned. He has a
| wife and kids - I'm not going to cast the first stone. They dropped their
| opposition, recommended the MS deal, and got paid a quarter of a million
| (equivalent) to do sweet fuck-all for 6 months. My friend feels like a
| sell-out, but his daughter's now in a better school.
|
| I don't know how to stop this happening, but until it does, MS (or GM, or
| Exxon, or whoever) will win and win and win. Ask yourself how much your
| advocacy would sell for. Ask yourself how you'd explain to your wife that you
| were turning down enough money to send the kids to college because of your
| preferences for which software to use.
|
| This is how it's done people.
`----
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=499412&threshold=4&commentsort=0&mode=thread&cid=22866970
That's the case with the Burton Group (Peter O'Kelly et al), which did a lot of
business (consulting) with Microsoft after its so-called 'study'
http://antitrust.slated.org/www.iowaconsumercase.org/011607/3000/PX03096.pdf
"Consultants: These guys are your best bets as moderators. Get a well-known
consultant on your side early, but don’t let him publish anything blatantly
pro-Microsoft. Then, get him to propose himself to the conference organizers
as a moderator, whenever a panel opportunity comes up. Since he’s well-known,
but apparently independent, he’ll be accepted - one less thing for the
constantly-overworked conference organizer to worry about, right?"
-- Microsoft
|
|