Jesper Lund Stocholm <jls2008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
> Mark Kent <mark.kent@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:q8kmb5-aep.ln1
> @ellandroad.demon.co.uk:
>
>> So again, what's your excuse for assisting in pushing an immature and
>> unimplemntable document through a fast-track process which was never
>> intended for such use?
>
> Please note that the above is your personal opinion. I simply don't agree
> with you on this.
Which part of the question are you claiming to disagree with?
>
>> ... and no hiding behind childish "exposures" please.
>
> How many times have I hit you in the face with the "exposure"? Not a single
> time, Mark. As I said I think the "exposure" was funny -
Why? There is no "exposure", my position remains a) consistent and b)
honest. I see nothing amusing in it.
--
| mark at ellandroad dot demon dot co dot uk |
| Cola faq: http://www.faqs.org/faqs/linux/advocacy/faq-and-primer/ |
| Cola trolls: http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/ |
| Open platforms prevent vendor lock-in. Own your Own services! |
|
|
