Jesper Lund Stocholm <jls2008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
> Mark Kent <mark.kent@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
> news:3ohnb5-av1.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
>
>> Jesper Lund Stocholm <jls2008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>> Mark Kent <mark.kent@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:q8kmb5-aep.ln1
>>> @ellandroad.demon.co.uk:
>>>
>>>> So again, what's your excuse for assisting in pushing an immature
>>>> and unimplemntable document through a fast-track process which was
>>>> never intended for such use?
>>>
>>> Please note that the above is your personal opinion. I simply don't
>>> agree with you on this.
>>
>> Which part of the question are you claiming to disagree with?
>
> I dissagree that I am "assisting in pushing an immarure and unimplementable
> document through a fast-track process which was never intended for such
> use".
So you deny that you're doing it, now?
>
>>>> ... and no hiding behind childish "exposures" please.
>>>
>>> How many times have I hit you in the face with the "exposure"? Not a
>>> single time, Mark. As I said I think the "exposure" was funny -
>>
>> Why? There is no "exposure", my position remains a) consistent and b)
>> honest. I see nothing amusing in it.
>
<snip irrelevance>
Care to address the question?
--
| mark at ellandroad dot demon dot co dot uk |
| Cola faq: http://www.faqs.org/faqs/linux/advocacy/faq-and-primer/ |
| Cola trolls: http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/ |
| Open platforms prevent vendor lock-in. Own your Own services! |
|
|
