Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [News] "Ready for the Desktop" is Microsoft-imposed FUD

In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Roy Schestowitz
<newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 wrote
on Sat, 17 May 2008 22:33:23 +0100
<3102331.OJJGj1XqPA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> It's time to retire "ready for the desktop"
>
> ,----[ Quote ]
> | Quite a few reviews of new Linux releases these days try to determine if a 
> | distribution is "ready for the desktop." I myself have probably been guilty 
> | of using that phrase, but I think it's time we officially retire this 
> | criterion.   
> `----
>
> http://www.linux.com/feature/134808
>
> Microsoft's "people-ready" paid shills come to mind (links below [1,2,3]).

May make no difference.  Microsoft phones are
already showing up.  Most likely this will be the next
battleground, and it's a very highly fragmented market --
not unlike the homebrew computer markets of the late 70's,
in some respects.  Microsoft could very well unify these
markets under one well-known umbrella OS, though they'll
have to fight off Symbian first.

http://www.last100.com/2008/02/10/microsoft-sony-ericsson-team-up-to-bring-windows-mobile-to-sexy-new-smart-phone/

http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/features/2002/oct02/10-22smartphoneqa.mspx
(yes, it's a bit dated)

http://www.telecomtiger.com/fullstory.aspx?storyid=1958&flag=1&passfrom=topstory
(40% of the market by 2012)

To be fair, Linux phones are also out there; many are enumerated here:
http://www.linuxdevices.com/articles/AT9423084269.html

and a special report highlights Motorola's Linux phone strategy:

http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS4504156025.html

This report might be overly optimistic (but
then, so is Microsoft's), but suggests Linux
might have 31% of the market to Microsoft's 40%:
http://www.geek.com/linux-based-smartphones-to-see-incredible-growth/

We shall see.

[rest snipped for brevity]

-- 
#191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Useless C/C++ Programming Idea #104392:
for(int i = 0; i < 1000000; i++) sleep(0);
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index