On 2008-05-21, Moshe. Goldfarb <brick.n.straw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 21 May 2008 15:54:41 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote:
>
>> On 2008-05-21, Moshe. Goldfarb <brick.n.straw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 21 May 2008 14:48:26 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>
>>>> A wolf in designer clothing
>>>>
>>>> ,----[ Quote
>>>>| Ok, so I kinda liked the latter iterations of the Graywolf look for Amarok 2.
>>>>| Apparently, not many others did though.
>>>
>>> New look.
>>> Same buggy program.
>>>
>>> Amarok needs a complete re-write.
>>
>> What exactly would you rewrite about it?
>
> Speed it up.
It's already as fas as comparable programs are.
> Fix the horrible UI.
It already has a better UI than comparable programs.
> Get rid of the bloat.
It's no worse than comparable programs in this respect.
If you don't want something amarok-like, you don't have to use
anything amarok-like at all.
> Fix the bugs.
> Make it handle large MP3 collections better.
It already does that as good or better than comparable programs.
> Playlist generation.
> etc
>
This sounds like a non-user indulging in Google harvesting.
--
Apple: Because a large harddrive is for power users.
|||
/ | \
Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
|
|
