"Kelsey Bjarnason" <kelseyb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:11:21 -0500, Ezekiel wrote:
>> "Terry Porter" <linux-2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:22:54 -0500, Ezekiel wrote:
>>>> So there you have it. Looks pretty much like proof to me that Roy
>>>> Schestowitz has automated his spamming efforts.
>>> Roy S advocates Linux, you are the spammer here.
>> So you are also too stupid to know what spamming is. Tell me Terry... is
>> there any subject where you aren't completely clueless?
>> Usenet convention defines spamming as excessive multiple posting, that
>> is, the repeated posting of a message (or substantially similar
>> messages). </quote>
> Ah, and Roy's posts are all just copies of each other, then? If so,
> they'd qualify as newsgroup spam.
Not *all* - at least attempt to comprehend what you read. The definition
is "excessive multiple posting with a substantially similar message" which
is correct. Take a look at how many messages are repeated. And take a look
at the "Related" BS where he is constantly repeating previous posts over
and over and over again because they are somehow "related" to the latest
> If not, you're a moron.
Only a moron would attempt to frame the question this way.