Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [News] Microsoft Goes Litigious on Software Patents


On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 05:44:39 -0600, Terry Porter wrote:

> On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:50:22 -0500, Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:49:45 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>> 
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>> 
>>> Microsoft Files Suit to Defend Visual Studio Users
>>> 
>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>>| Microsoft is not mentioned in any of the three complaints. However, in
>>>the | suit that Microsoft filed against WebXchange, it says that the
>>>charges relate | to the companies' use of Microsoft's Visual Studio
>>>software. By asking the | court to declare WebXchange's patents invalid,
>>>Microsoft hopes to defend its | customers FedEx, Dell and Allstate and
>>>spare the thousands of other Visual | Studio users from similar suits,
>>>Microsoft says. |
>>>| FedEx, Dell and Allstate have already sought indemnification from
>>>Microsoft, | Microsoft said in the lawsuit. Most large software makers
>>>like Microsoft | indemnify their customers, meaning that if their
>>>products are found to cause | harm including patent infringement, the
>>>software developer will bear the | responsibility for the problems.
>>> `----
>>> 
>>> http://www.pcworld.com/article/154014/.html?tk=rss_news
>> 
>> Gee, so Microsoft is indemnifying it's customers.
> 
> Please give FULL details of the Microsoft "indemnification".
> 
> I think its probably worthless, feel free to correct me *HERE*. Web links
> will be rejected as insufficient evidence.
> 
>>  Something that
>> companies like Red Hat have refused to do.
> 
> For a good reason Wintroll.
> 
> 
>> Microsoft is doing the right thing here,
> 
> Bullshit. It's the WRONG thing.
> 
> 
>> yet you seem to think it's bad.
> 
> Roys not alone, the *entire* GPL community feel exactly the same way, (as
> if you didn't know).
> 
> 
> Windows ... which of our patents will we use against you today ?

"Which of our *alleged* patents", surely? After all AFIAK M$ have never
publicly shown *which* of their patents are allegedly infringed by Linux.
How does anyone know *M$* haven't stolen any open source?


-- 
Most people are sheep.  
Microsoft is very effective 
at fleecing the flockers.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index