Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [News] Spectrum Oligarchy Ends, Spectrum Liberated

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

____/ Mark Kent on Tuesday 11 November 2008 15:42 : \____

> 
> 
> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>
>> ____/ Phil Da Lick! on Thursday 06 November 2008 12:45 : \____
>>
>>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>> 
>>>> White spaces vote gets FCC approval
>>>> 
>>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>>> | The Federal Communications Commission voted unanimously Tuesday to
>>>> | release unused broadcast TV spectrum for unlicensed use, giving
>>>> | technology leaders Google, Microsoft and others a victory in their bid
>>>> | to create a next-generation version of Wi-Fi.
>>>> `----
>>>> 
>>>> http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfgate/detail?blogid=19&entry_id=32304
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Unwise. How long until devices using this range start interfering with
>>> each other?
>>
>> What about smart radios? Covered in:
>>
>> Dan Gillmor, creator of the phrase, "Distributed Journalism" 16 (2005)
>> http://www.archive.org/details/e-dv262_02_dan_gillmor_009.ogg
>>
>> Dan Gillmor, creator of the phrase, "Distributed Journalism" 17 (2005)
>> http://www.archive.org/details/e-dv263_03_dan_gillmor_001.ogg
>>
> 
> Oh, I know how to build such things, but that's not the issue - the
> issue is migration.  For example, if there are, say, 1 million
> hospital systems susceptible to EM radiation, and they cost, say, £1,000
> each to replace on average, who pays?
> 
> Similarly, let's say that there are 80 million radios (broadcast
> receivers) in the UK which are susceptible, again, who pays?
> 
> What about ADSL receivers for broadband - there are about 10 million
> of these out there - who pays to replace them with "smart" ones, and so
> on.
> 
> My issue is about the existing plant, not about what could be done if
> there weren't any.

As Gillmore says, this may take /many/ years, but let's make it gradual. That's
like saying, why make CDs when we already have cassette tapes and CDs can make
old stereos obsolete (like portable music players do)?

There's a serious issue here which is risk. Still, should this impede progress?

- -- 
                ~~ Best of wishes

Roy S. Schestowitz      |    United States: #1 in spam export
http://Schestowitz.com  |  Open Prospects   |     PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Tasks: 140 total,   1 running, 139 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
      http://iuron.com - knowledge engine, not a search engine
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkkaJ2wACgkQU4xAY3RXLo43lgCdFdAeqnYH6pcbFG99ESCFk3YY
uvAAoLBBBk1o7d+h7WxnmU/oJtPFEEAR
=QQA9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index