On 2008-11-10, Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> claimed:
>
> Windows 7 early promise: Passes the Vista test
>
> ,----[ Quote ]
>| A day spent with a Windows 7 preview build - Milestone 3, running on a laptop
>| loaned for the purpose (Dell XPS M1330, Core 2 Duo 2.3Ghz, with 3GB RAM)
>| tends to confirm that view. Windows 7 feels more polished than Vista, even in
>| the preview, and performance is good.
> `----
>
> http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2008/10/28/windows_seven_review/
Supposedly Fisted looked pretty good to people testing it. It was only
after it was released on an unsuspecting public, after it started
getting put on hardware that wasn't carefully crafted to make it
perform OK, that it was shown to be the pig it was all along.
So, Windwoes 7 /looks/ better, more polished? Good. It's still going to
run like a turd for the average user.
2 MEs in a row! Wanna go for 3, MICROS~1?
--
Microsoft: The company that made computing dangerous.
|
|