Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] Extortion Directed at Google, Using Intellectual Monopoliesp

Hash: SHA1

Google Sued For Patent Infringement Over AdSense, Again

,----[ Quote ]
| Profy reports that a Russian company is suing Google for $3 billion over 
| Google’s contextual ad program, AdSense.  


Google Faces Patent Extortion From Russia

,----[ Quote ]
| The concept of contextual advertising was hardly a new idea. In fact, from 
| the early days of web advertising, it was always a target. Plenty of other 
| companies tried to do it, but what made Google so successful was that it 
| actually implemented the process in a way that worked. It was about putting 
| it into practice, not the grand scheme that ended up in a patent somewhere. 
| This seems like nothing more than a company trying to shakedown Google.     


Bilski to the rescue?

In re Bilski and Business Method Patents

,----[ Quote ]
| Under the new standard, a process must either be tied to the use of a machine 
| or be a transformation of something physical to be patentable, which would 
| include a transformation of data that represents something physical.  



Software Patents: More on Stop Software Patents Initiative

,----[ Quote ]
| Initiatives like the world day Against software patents,  or the stop
| software patent initiative, are definitely a good thing. Not the ultimate
| answer to the problem though, I am afraid.
| Keith Bergelt, Open Innovation Network’s new appointed CEO, was clear telling
| me that OIN won’t collaborate with FFII or similar organizations to fight
| against software patents in Europe. OIN cares just about Linux, so far. That
| is a pity, considering that they are lobbying around Europe now.


Bilski: Be prepared for huge lobbying in Congress?

,----[ Quote ]
| The outcome of the Bilski case, which should be published in October, might
| invalidate software patents in the United States:
|     Plager said he regretted the unintended consequences of the decisions in
|     State Street Bank and AT&T. Those rulings led to a flood of applications
|     for software and business method patents, he noted. If we “rethink the
|     breadth of patentable subject matter,” he said, we should ask whether
|     these categories should be excluded from patent protection.
| If the CAFC are clever enough to follow the Supreme Court and kick software
| patents out, you might see the desperate large corporations and their patent
| department rushing to Congress. Especially if tomorrow the banks value their
| patent portfolio as void, and not useful to get any credit.


Latha Jishnu: The mouse that bit Microsoft

,----[ Quote ]
| Here’s what Gates wrote in an office memorandum in 1991. “If people had
| understood how patents would be granted when most of today’s ideas were
| invented, and had taken out patents, the industry would be at a complete
| standstill today. . . I feel certain that some large company will patent some
| obvious thing related to interface, object orientation, algorithm,
| application extension or other crucial technique.”
| This was the year after Microsoft launched Windows 3.0, the first of its new
| operating systems that would become hugely popular across the world. Yet,
| three years down the line, Microsoft had changed from a kitten that was
| content with copyright protection to an aggressive patents tiger. In 1991,
| Microsoft had filed fewer than 50 patent applications whereas last year it
| was awarded 1,637 patents, almost a 12 per cent increase in the number of
| patents it received in 2006. According to IFI Patent Intelligence, the rise
| in Microsoft’s patents portfolio bucked the general trend in 2007 when the
| number of patents issued by the US Patents and Trademark Office dipped by 10
| per cent. Apparently several thousand of the company’s filings are still
| pending.
| All this may prompt the reader to conclude that there is indeed a direct
| correlation between IPR and growth — and wealth — as the company claims. Not
| true, says Mark H Webbink, a US Supreme Court lawyer who is a recognised
| voice on IT issues. Charting the company’s revenues, R&D spending and patent
| filings from 1985 onwards, he shows that the spike in patent filings occurred
| long after the Microsoft “had become well established and was being
| investigated for its monopolistic practices”. Webbink contends that patents
| did not spur the launch and rapid growth of the mass market software
| industry. On the other hand, patents have become a threat to software
| innovation, he warns.

Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index