> Quack snotted:
>> Huh? Chris Ahlstrom admitted to using it. Oh! Hang on. That would be on
>> his work Windows machine.
> Is it "his" work machine or is it "his employer's" work machine?
> There's a bit of a difference there.
Well, which interpretation allows Quack more opportunity to attack an
advocate of FOSS?
'Before we know it, some of them will be suggesting that GUI Desktops
are the work of the devil and that "bash" is "enough for their
needs".' - "True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark