On 2009-04-29, Hadron <hadronquark@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> JEDIDIAH <jedi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> On 2009-04-28, Doctor Smith <iaintgotnostinkinemail@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On 28 Apr 2009 04:00:43 GMT, ray wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:50:15 -0400, Doctor Smith wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:46:54 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Achievements for a better start up performance
>>>>>
>>>>> Why waste the time?
>>>>> Just ask the freetards in COLA who claim it's faster than MSOfiice.
>>>>
>>>> Well DipStick - it doesn't matter much does it? Since MS Office won't run
>>>> (natively) on Linux anyway and this IS a Linux advocacy group!
>>>
>>> But you freetards sure wish it would or you wouldn't be trotting out that
>>> abortion called Wine in order to attempt to run MSOffice.
>>
>> You need to start taking your schizophrenia meds again.
>>
>> NONE of the Linux users here like msoffice or care to run it under
>> Wine.
>
> Huh? Chris Ahlstrom admitted to using it. Oh! Hang on. That would be on
> his work Windows machine.
Is it "his" work machine or is it "his employer's" work machine?
There's a bit of a difference there.
It's something painfully obvious to anyone that's ever spent any
amount of time in a Corporation.
>
>>
>> You need to get over yourself and your 15 times re-hashed clones of
>> Lotus and WP.
>
--
Apple: Because the world doesn't have enough peasants. |||
/ | \
|
|