After takin' a swig o' grog, Tim Smith belched out
this bit o' wisdom:
> In article <ntjtd7305hi8.dlg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> At least Reuters has the honesty to withdraw a story, even if it is only
>> possible the information is incorrect.
>>
>> You, on the other hand, have never withdrawn a story. Ever. Even when
>> proven wrong. When you finally do admit to any error (which is very rare
>> that you do admit to such, and then usually after weeks of hammering you
>> with proof), you don't withdraw the story, you instead use markup to
>> "strike out" part of it visually, so that the original text is still in the
>> article and will still be indexed by Google as it was originally written,
>> with no retraction or admission of error on your part.
>>
>> After all, you wouldn't want google to contain an admission from you that
>> you were wrong on anything. Right?
>>
>> You're such a hypocrite.
>
> Queue Linonut with an excuse for Roy in 3...2...1...go!
You guys are feckless.
--
Your reasoning is excellent -- it's only your basic assumptions that are wrong.
|
|
