-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
____/ Sinister Midget on Sunday 05 April 2009 00:30 : \____
> On 2009-04-04, Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> claimed:
>> On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 22:47:45 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>> The TomTom suit was a very good one. It completely destroyed the illusion
>>> that Microsoft is not an aggressor, so people are waking up and feeling
>>> disgusted by Microsoft's new (and short-lived) business model.
>> Except, of course, for the fact that Microsoft was not the agressor.
>> TomTom threatened Microsoft more than a year ago with software patent
>> infringement. Microsoft was responding defensivly.
> Nice link you provided to back that claim. I suppose you have many more
> just like it, too.
>> So why falsely claim that Microsoft was the agressor, Roy?
> Because it isn't false. Unless you can show something that backs what
> you say happened.
Big Microsoft Lies. Revisonism and all...
Poor Microsoft... it HAD to attack Linux... it's the fault of Linux.
~~ Best of wishes
Roy S. Schestowitz | "Seeing bad movies only encourages them"
http://Schestowitz.com | Free as in Free Beer | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Load average (/proc/loadavg): 0.77 0.90 0.97 1/272 14543
http://iuron.com - semantic search engine project initiative
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----