Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index


Hash: SHA1

____/ Sinister Midget on Sunday 05 April 2009 00:30 : \____

> On 2009-04-04, Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> claimed:
>> On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 22:47:45 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>> The TomTom suit was a very good one. It completely destroyed the illusion
>>> that Microsoft is not an aggressor, so people are waking up and feeling
>>> disgusted by Microsoft's new (and short-lived) business model.
>> Except, of course, for the fact that Microsoft was not the agressor.
>> TomTom threatened Microsoft more than a year ago with software patent
>> infringement.  Microsoft was responding defensivly.
> Nice link you provided to back that claim. I suppose you have many more
> just like it, too.
>> So why falsely claim that Microsoft was the agressor, Roy?
> Because it isn't false. Unless you can show something that backs what
> you say happened.
Big Microsoft Lies. Revisonism and all...

Poor Microsoft... it HAD to attack Linux... it's the fault of Linux.

- -- 
                ~~ Best of wishes

Roy S. Schestowitz      |    "Seeing bad movies only encourages them"
http://Schestowitz.com  | Free as in Free Beer |  PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Load average (/proc/loadavg): 0.77 0.90 0.97 1/272 14543
      http://iuron.com - semantic search engine project initiative
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re:
      • From: Sinister Midget
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index