Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 22:47:45 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>
>> The TomTom suit was a very good one. It completely destroyed the
>> illusion that Microsoft is not an aggressor, so people are waking up
>> and feeling disgusted by Microsoft's new (and short-lived) business
>> model.
>
> Except, of course, for the fact that Microsoft was not the agressor.
> TomTom threatened Microsoft more than a year ago with software patent
> infringement. Microsoft was responding defensivly.
>
> So why falsely claim that Microsoft was the agressor, Roy?
TomTom informs Microsoft that it may be infringing on TomTom
patents. According to Erik, that is a threat.
Microsoft takes TomTom to court. According to Erik, that is not
aggression.
What crack are you smoking, and can I have some?
Mart
--
"We will need a longer wall when the revolution comes."
--- AJS, quoting an uncertain source.
|
|
