Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] Lock-in Conundrum Justifies GNU/Linux

Hash: SHA1

The Dangers of Vendor Lock-In  

,----[ Quote ]
| Could your company become a victim of vendor lock-in? If you rely entirely on 
| proprietary software, you very well could be. What exactly is this vendor 
| lock-in of which I speak? It is a way of ensuring that you, the consumer, 
| will only be able to use specific products as set forth by select 
| manufacturers.    
| A classic, old-school example of vendor lock-in would have to be with ink jet 
| printer cartridges. When you purchase any major brand of ink jet printer, you 
| will be stuck relying on ink they themselves produce, no matter how hard you 
| might wish to use something else.    
| [...]
| So by now, you get the general idea -- lock-in is a huge negative. Finding 
| software solutions that provide you with an out should you need it is key. 
| For example, let's say I wish to migrate my email from Thunderbird to 
| Evolution. And to make matters even more complex, let's say I am moving this 
| email from Windows over to a new Linux PC. One might think this to be a 
| really scary kind of deal.      


Standards: Have Any Suggestions for the Next Version of ODF?

,----[ Quote ]
| Personally, I'd say the main thing it needs is what only Microsoft can 
| provide: true interoperability, guaranteed, with Microsoft's 'standard'. I am 
| hearing from one and all that the crutches being offered for ODF to try to do 
| so don't really work very well. That is wrong. Period. It's what I expected, 
| but it needs to be fixed. What if there were another natural disaster, like 
| Katrina? Interoperability and the ability to communicate with government 
| agencies can mean your life. It's that serious, and who is to argue that the 
| lives of Linux users don't matter?       


"We have increased our prices over the last 10 years (while) other component
prices have come down and continue to come down."

                --Joachim Kempin, Microsoft


Some thoughts on the Microsoft’s implementation of ODF

,----[ Quote ]
| Now you have Microsoft’s bellydancing and basically declaring that they, who
| sell the “best office suite on the market” (I don’t make that claim) will
| offer poor support on ODF because of product limitations. Am I the only one
| here feeling that Redmond is trying -again-to play games? Any additional
| information would be welcome at this stage, of course, but the market should
| pay close attention to this issue.
| I have hailed and declared myself positively satisfied the inclusion of
| Microsoft in the ODF committees at the OASIS consortium. I have read the
| contributions of its employees and they were useful and constructive. This
| being said, Doug’s blog leaves me with an odd taste in my mouth.
| To be frank, I feel that Doug has been looking for a way to tell us that
| Microsoft’s support of ODF will be crappy and that it was intended to be that
| way. I realize I have no substantial evidence of what I’m asserting here, but
| since when does Microsoft speak of the new features of MS Office with a sorry
| tone?


Compatibility, interoperability, and interchangeability

,----[ Quote ]
| I often find it amusing when people pull out a very significant sounding,
| obviously committee-written definition of “interoperability.” If I didn’t
| know better, I would have thought that the definition was written and then
| delivered on a stone tablet. Is this necessary, or is interoperability one of
| those things that you know when you see it?
| [...]
| With cloud computing becoming more and more important, people are correctly
| asking questions about standards. My sense is that virtually none of the
| cloud environments are interchangeable and that interoperability among them
| is sketchy, at best. Unless one provider ends up being overwhelmingly
| dominant, interoperability will need to be improved.


Microsoft spits out ODF plans for Office 2007 SP2

,----[ Quote ]
| Even the European Commission questioned Microsoft’s intentions. After all, it
| had been dogged by less-than-pretty grumbles from a range of opponents about
| the software giant’s campaign to get its contentious Office Open XML (OOXML)
| document format approved as an international standard at the second time of
| trying.
| EC regulators said they would investigate whether that announcement really
| did mean "better interoperability", allowing customers "to process and
| exchange their documents with the software product of their choice".


Microsoft Invites to ODF Workshop in Redmond

,----[ Quote ]
| Maybe this invitation has something to do with Microsoft's public "ODF has
| clearly won" statement at a recent event. Thus, if Microsoft has to support
| ODF in their products due to market demand, what ISV can still ignore
| supporting ODF? I guess none! Anyway, OpenOffice.org is just one
| implementation of ODF and is facing more than 1.2M downloads per week (!!!)
| on average (since the beginning of 2008) with most recent download numbers
| having been close to 2M.


BE, NL: governments will not use ISO OOXML

,----[ Quote ]
| Asked to comment on last week's ISO approval for OOXML, Fedict's chief IT
| architect, Peter Strickx, said: "There will have to be multiple
| implementations, in order for us not to become dependent on a single vendor.
| It will also have to be compatible with open standards that we already use,
| in this case Open Document Format ODF."


DE: German Foreign Ministry will not use ISO OOXML

,----[ Quote ]
| In the weeks prior to the second round of votes last September,
| irregularities were reported in the standard committees in many participating
| countries. These claims  continued until after the final discussion, in
| February and March this year.
| The European Commission has started an investigation into the allegations.
| The Commission sent a letter to all EU national standards committees in
| Europe, requesting information about the process. Sources at the Commission
| declined to comment, as the investigation is on-going and no official
| position has yet been adopted.

Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index