On Feb 8, 3:17 pm, Tim Smith <reply_in_gr...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In article <gmmkou$2m...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>
> Hadron <hadronqu...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Q: why on earth do the COLA "advocates" think ANYONE would be PAID to
> > laugh at the moron "advocates" who post in COLA??? Hell, I would pay to
>
> Note how HPT ran away when I responded to his claim that MS is paying me
> by pointing out how, if he could actually prove that, he could get me in
> serious trouble (a felony conviction on my record, possible large fine
> and/or jail time), since I have testified, under oath, in Federal court,
> that I have no relationship with Microsoft other than an occasional user
> of some of their products and I used to have an MSDN subscription and I
> am currently on some kind of mailing list of theirs that my boss told me
> to sign up for (it seems to mostly be announcements of seminars and
> product introductions and stuff like that).
>
> These people (HPT, Roy, Kent, Sinister Midget, 7, etc) have no evidence
> for much of their claims. When an opportunity arises for them to give
> clear and convincing proof, they have nothing to offer.
>
> --
> --Tim Smith
Hi Tim,
I don't think you or Erik are paid to be here, you just don't spend
enough time among us. The perjury thing, well you would have to be
very close to the centre of the storm to even be investigated for
that. What you say in your declaration/testimony would have to have a
direct impact on the outcome of the trial and all that.
I really do suggest reading through alt.religion.scientology to see
what happens when false testimony is given, lawyers buy fabricated
declarations or lie to the judge ... mostly nothing.
|
|
