Terry Porter wrote:
> Doug Mentohl wrote:
>
>> "The Institution shall not without the prior written consent of MRL ..
>> incorporate .. any software that is subject to an Excluded Licence. An
>> ?Excluded Licence? is one that requires as a condition of use,
>> modification and/or distribution of such software that such software (a)
>> be disclosed or distributed in source code form; and/or (b) be licensed
>> for the purpose of making derivative works; and/or (c) be
>> redistributable at no charge. Examples of Excluded Licences include
>> GNU?s General Public License (GPL) .."
>
> This is way beyond acceptable.
>
> Shame on you Microsoft.
Equal shame on those who signed it.
Their names ought to be publicised because they did this too.
Unless names become widely made known, they could be the same infiltrators
that are signing todays signatures on behalf of micoshaft
as discussed in PLEX_2456.pdf http://www.iowa.gotthefacts.org
All the opposition will have been dealt with through
internal discussions naming the pro-Linux and pro-OSS technology
guys as desribed in this document that deals with disposing of
Linux engineers at Del$ PX9280.pdf http://www.iowa.gotthefacts.org
and lying to share holders about not taking up Linux opportunities
as it came into view.
|
|
