Above the whining & shreiking of the trolls, Chris Ahlstrom was heard
to say:
> After takin' a swig o' grog, Roy Schestowitz belched out
> this bit o' wisdom:
>
>> The ones I hear complaining about it are incognito Microsoft Munchkins.
>> It must means it's very dangerous to Microsoft's cash flow.
>
> Arguing after the fact.
>
> Just stick to facts, Roy. Let others do the paranoid-sounding speculation.
Well there's certainly one munchkin in here, who decries OO.o at *every*
opportunity in favor of M$Office. The troll *claims* not to be a shill, but
as someone said in another group:
"There is a certain amount of hostility towards Linux in most of your
posts. Your statement above is one prime example. Google can reveal
plenty others. Even a blind person reading this newsgroup could pretty
quickly figure out that you do appear to favor MS. Hence the question,
why /do/ you bother with linux?"
Anyone wanna guess who the shill is? <grin>
--
Some of Hadron Quack's blunders:
Surely you are not comparing the
non-existent Linux (at that time)
with Windows 98?
Hadron: Message-ID: <npk5rvzafy.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Linux as a desktop OS is pretty much doomed it would appear.
Too little too late.
Hadron: Message-ID: <fnd3jj$or8$2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Google Earth on Linux runs through its own Wine installer. Unless they
have gone "native"
Hadron: Message-ID: <gu1v6l$dmo$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Getting high performance Video cards working is a damn sight
easier on XP because the installers are better.
Debian/Ubuntu are a pain in the hole - you need to recompile the latest
NVidia drivers using a set version of the compiler, for example, when
changing kernels.
Hadron: Message-ID: <c9rks4-gc7.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
