After takin' a swig o' grog, Erik Funkenbusch belched out
this bit o' wisdom:
> On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 06:36:03 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> After takin' a swig o' grog, Erik Funkenbusch belched out
>> this bit o' wisdom:
>>
>>> On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:20:41 -0700, Tim Smith wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <BtP%l.58217$qa.25215@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>>>> Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> After takin' a swig o' grog, Tim Smith belched out
>>>>> this bit o' wisdom:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article <03K%l.13972$he4.13767@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>>>>>> Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Do you approve of Roy's lying about Jimmi Hugh's Wikipedia editing?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cut the sophistry, Tim.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You first have to establish that it's lying.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It has been established by the edit history of Wikipedia.
>>>>>
>>>>> So what was the lie, Tim?
>>>>
>>>> That Jimmi Hugh removed Homer's Bill Gates stuff from the ACPI Wikipedia
>>>> entry.
>>>
>>> Oh, and that Jimmi Hugh works for Microsoft.
>>
>> Did he ever? Who does he work for now?
>
> No idea, but neither does Roy. Doesn't stop him from making baseless
> claims.
If you don't know, then how do you know Roy is making a baseless claim about
Jimmi's employer?
--
You have a strong desire for a home and your family interests come first.
|
|
