On 2009-06-18, Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> claimed:
> After takin' a swig o' grog, Peter belched out
> this bit o' wisdom:
>
>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>> Snip
>>> To: cameronm
>>> Subject: Seybold report on office computing
>>> Date: Wed Apr 29 19:11:02 PDT 1992
>>>
>>> It praises Os/2 2.0 endlessly using the charts from the IBM
>>> white papers. For example the chart showing windows giving you
>>> only 506k of memory and Os/2 giving you 620k.
>>
>> Very interesting article on Os/2 2.0 !
>> My experiences with Os/2 were not good but what were yours ?
>
> OS/2 was a pro OS, while Windows at that time was a single-tasking toy.
Whereas now Windows is a toy that you'd be advised to not do more than
a couple of things on it at a time. And save what're you're doing
frequently.
--
Don't ask me, I have random access memory.
------------------------------------------------------------
Eee PC900 16G SSD 2G RAM Ubuntu 9.04
|
|
