On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:49:04 -0500, above the shrieking & whining of the
trolls, JEDIDIAH was heard to say:
> On 2009-03-24, Doctor Smith <iaintgotnostinkinemail@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:41:19 -0400, Ezekiel wrote:
>>
>>> "Phil Da Lick!" <phil_the_lick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
>>> message news:yamdnWlm7f87JlXUnZ2dnUVZ8v6WnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
>>>>> "We have come across a botnet worm spreading around called "psyb0t".
>>>>> It
> [deletia]
>>>> This post is the metaphorical equivalent of blaming manufacturers of
>>>> burgler alarms when the owners are not only leaving their front doors
>>>> open, but have a notice with the alarm code, which happens to be
>>>> "1234" or "1111", left by the key panel.
>>>
>>> Once again the freetard hypocrites come out of the woodwork. If a
>>> Windows machine gets compromised it's because of a flaw with Windows.
>>> But when a Linux machine gets compromised it's *always* the fault of
>>> the user.
>>
>> It's hysterical watching the freetards swarming around the thread in
>> order to surround and protect their mother Linux.
>> Great entertainment!
>
> What's to "protect"?
>
> Don't bother to set a password and anyone that can search Google can
> login using that account.
>
> No amount of noise you can make can alter this.
It's hysterical watching the wintrolls swarming around the thread
desperately trying to denigrate Linux, & failing *miserably*! ;-)
|
|
