wispygalaxy wrote:
> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>
>> ____/ wispygalaxy on Friday 29 May 2009 21:11 : \____
>>
>>> Hadron wrote:
>>>
>>>> wispygalaxy <wispygalaxy@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> Gregory Shearman wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2009-05-21, wispygalaxy <wispygalaxy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>> Java is a popular language, and I hope it continues to have
>>>>>>> success. So
>>>>>>> many gadgets run Java. How can we live without it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Massive, bloated, clumsy. I can live without it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you like C++? I always see Java vs. C++ discussions.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I agree with Shearman here.
>>>>
>>>> Java is a sloppy, slow mess.
>>>>
>>>> It got popular because they "cross platformed it" (or claimed it)
>>>> early enough to sucker people in. The great majority of "cross
>>>> platform" Java apps are still a mess with differnt ideas of what GUI
>>>> to use and, generally, the programmer have ZERO idea about
>>>> efficiency.
>>>
>>> I've been interested in learning Java recently. I skimmed some books
>>> and
>>> decided that Java looked alright. It's used a lot in finance, which
>>> I'm
>>> majoring in. And my school teaches it extensively in CS classes.
>>>
>>> Have you tried out Java? Was it too slow for your taste? What kind
>>> of programming you do?
>>
>> "Hadron" is here to disrupt, troll and curse. Better not to feed it...
>
> I'm just curious on why Hadron dislikes Java so much. I'm open to
> hearing dissenting opinions. But I understand.
That one is easy. Java is not from MS, it was a threat to them.
So Hadron Snot Quark absolutely has to be against it.
--
Failure is not an option. It comes bundled with your Microsoft product.
|
|
