After takin' a swig o' grog, 7 belched out
this bit o' wisdom:
>> Judge Reviewing Pirate Bay Trial Bias Is Removed for Bias
>
> Wrong: He was removed for Bias^2
>
> If the original judge was removed for sqrt(Bias)
> then it follows that those judges that wax and wane
> are subject to pertubation by k*Sin(Bias) function where k
> is some random fudge factor that can be made larger
> or smaller depending on the connections you have with
> the media industry and any handouts you may get.
> Let k be a function of media handout function f and
> of the US dollar $. Then k can be expressed as
> k = f($).
> Now we can see how dollars turn into bias...
> k*Sin(Bias) is equilavent to f($)*Sin(Bias).
>
> But a simple bias function like that can wax and wane
> too much statistically between a positive and
> negative number. So to avoid that, you need judges
> with Bias^2 inserted into the judiciary.
> Squaring Bias removes all negative values.
>
> Now bias effect becomes [f($)*Sin(Bias)]^2
> And if you plot the graph of the above function
> using GNUplot, you will see that for all
> real numbers the bias effect is always positive for all
> positive values of $ (except 0) and whatever bias your
> judge may claim to have on your case publicly
> (unless his Bias is exactly 0 or some multiple of PI).
:-D
I award you 5 Official Hadron Doggie Drops® for that one, 7!
To get them, though, you will have to Suck Up® to Miguel de Icaza.
--
Q: Why do the police always travel in threes?
A: One to do the reading, one to do the writing, and the other keeps
an eye on the two intellectuals.
|
|
