Homer wrote:
>> asshole wrote:
>>>
>>> leg-humper wrote:
>>>>
>>>> You idiot, it's a Denial of Service attack
>perhaps you think SomeBloke is an "idiot" because he claims to be
>able to access a site under DDoS attack without issue, despite the fact
>that DDoS countermeasures, such as Center Track, Packet Marking, and
>Load Balancing have been well known and utilised for years.
The trolling fsckwits don't know anything about that stuff - they just
saw an opportunity to "assume" certain things, since they were not
clearly spelled-out, so they could do a worst-case interpretation of
what an advocate said.
>>> Scary isn't it?
>
>Yes, the level of ignorance exhibited by you drooling Microsoft
>astroturfers is absolutely terrifying, especially as it's your precious
>Microsoft Swiss-Cheese operating system that's facilitating these
>attacks in the first place.
Exactly. The Quack asshole and his leg-humper just made complete
jackasses of themselves, yet again.
|
|
