Verily I say unto thee, that Chris Ahlstrom spake thusly:
> After takin' a swig o' grog, Tim Smith belched out this bit o'
>> He lists three problems with Linux that you and the other fake
>> "advocates" repeatedly claim aren't real--people who say they have
>> those problems must be trolls.
Why would someone who is genuinely advocating Linux, post Linux problems
to the Linux advocacy group? COLA is not a support group, nor is it a
"complain about Linux" group, it's a group for discussing the /benefits/
of Linux. Why would you then think it's unreasonable to claim those who
repeatedly criticise Linux on COLA are trolls?
> Depends where and how they're posting.
Given that a) both GNU/Linux and OpenOffice in particular are major
thorns in Microsoft's side, and b) the Linux antagonists here are all
Microsoft supporters, I'd say it's pretty obvious that they are in fact
trolls ... putting it mildly.
| "Seek not the favour of the multitude; it is seldom got by honest
| and lawful means. But seek the testimony of few; and number not
| voices, but weigh them." ~ Immanuel Kant
Fedora release 8 (Werewolf) on sky, running kernel 188.8.131.52-57.fc8
00:22:40 up 78 days, 4:20, 5 users, load average: 0.85, 1.02, 0.91