On 2009-08-21, Ezekiel <zeke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> "JEDIDIAH" <jedi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:slrnh8rq4k.pmt.jedi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> On 2009-08-20, Ezekiel <zeke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Lusotec" <nomail@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:4a8dbf91$0$4371$c5fe31e7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Ezekiel wrote:
>>>>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>>>> Linux vs Windows 7
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>>>>> (...)
>>>>>> http://www.tuxradar.com/content/linux-vs-windows-7
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> From the article...
>>>>>
>>>>> <quote>
>>>>> But when we compared the 64-bit version of Windows 7 against its
>>>>> equivalent Ubuntu release, Linux was faster on most of the tests we
>>>>> ran,
>>>>> including boot time, shutdown time and most of the filesystem tests.
>>>>> The
>>>>> only test where Windows 7 was significantly faster than everything
>>>>> else
>>>>> was the Richards benchmark of overall system performance.
>>>>> </quote>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sounds about right. Linux is faster in "boot time" and "shutdown time"
>>>>> and
>>>>> Windows 7 was "significantly faster" in overall system performance.
>>>>
>>>> Richards benchmark (results in miliseconds)
>>>> Ubuntu 9.04 x86_64 - 375.32 - 100.25%
>>>> Windows 7 x65_64 - 374.4 - 100%
>>>>
>>>> Yes, *significantly* faster! :)
>>>
>>> Their words - not mine.
>>
>> So? It still amounts to a very selective presentation of the
>> information that's essentially a misrepresntation. You pick and
>> choose the bits you want to hide and those that you want to show.
>>
>> You're very much like a lawyer in that respect...
>>
>> or someone in advertising.
>
> You obviously suffer from a reading comprehension problem. I cited one
If I did, your creative interpretation might go over better.
> entire paragraph that was longer in length than the single paragraph that
> Schestowitz quoted. Exactly how many pages of an article you expect people
> to post????
--
Oracle... can't live with it... |||
/ | \
can't just replace it with postgres...
|
|
